Most ophthalmologists have treated glaucoma patients whose disease progresses, despite seemingly well controlled intraocular pressure (IOP) measured in the clinic during office hours. Normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) patients especially exhibit this trend. Although other unknown factors may play a role in progressive optic nerve head injury, elevated IOP is the only proven treatable risk factor. However, the IOP data collected in the clinic paint a small picture of the optic nerve head environment throughout the 24-hour period. The effects of nocturnal IOP patterns are often overlooked, despite patients spending a significant portion of their lives in a sleep state. A better understanding of the 24-hour variations in the optic nerve head environment and how these variations may be affecting patients’ disease is crucial to mitigating glaucoma progression.
Nocturnal Intraocular Pressure and Glaucoma Progression
Over the past 2 decades, extensive research has been dedicated to studying the normal IOP pattern in humans. Intraocular pressure typically follows a nychthemeral rhythm, meaning that IOP fluctuates from day to night following light–stimulus patterns. These patterns are based on input from the retinal melanopsin-expressing ganglion cells to the suprachiasmatic nucleus in the hypothalamus.1 In healthy subjects of all ages, IOP tends to peak at night and dip during the day.2-4 Aqueous production decreases overnight, so elevated nighttime IOP is thought to be primarily due to increases in episcleral venous pressure and choroidal congestion that occur with horizontal positioning. However, a few studies have shown that IOP remains higher in sleep states regardless of positioning.5,6 Thus, when measuring IOP during the day, it is likely at one of its lowest values for the 24-hour period.
In patients who have glaucoma, 24-hour IOP patterns are more varied. While most studies have continued to show nighttime peaks in glaucoma, these peaks tend to occur later in the night or early morning, and some patients do have peaks during the day.7,8 Also, patients with glaucoma seem to have higher amplitudes of variation in IOP from day to night, indicating larger swings in IOP compared to normal.9-11 Some researchers have proposed that these variation patterns are related to circadian rhythm disruption in glaucoma patients who already have injury to their retinal ganglion cells.12 A link between sleep disturbances and glaucoma has been repeatedly established.13,14
More recent studies have used a contact lens sensor (CLS) to measure IOP-related corneoscleral changes continuously for 24-hour periods in healthy subjects and in patients with glaucoma. These studies have confirmed the normal nychthemeral IOP pattern in humans and have also allowed for analysis of the relationship between 24-hour IOP-related changes and visual field progression. The CLS studies have collectively suggested that higher day-to-night IOP fluctuations and nighttime IOP spikes are associated with faster visual field progression.10,11,15-17
There may be a few explanations for why nocturnal IOP values tend to be more volatile in patients with glaucoma. As mentioned above, IOP elevates at night primarily due to increased episcleral venous pressure and choroidal vascular congestion. This normal elevation, related to reduced venous outflow, may be exacerbated in glaucoma patients who already have impaired trabecular outflow.18 Further, changes in IOP associated with horizontal or sleep positioning seem to be more dramatic and longer lived in patients who have glaucoma than in patients who do not have glaucoma,19 suggesting that normal vascular autoregulatory mechanisms may be dysfunctional at baseline in glaucoma patients. Also, daytime glaucoma medications can preferentially lower daytime IOP levels while not effectively lowering IOP overnight.
Known Effects of Glaucoma Treatments at Night
Indeed, certain classes of drug are more effective overnight than others. Prostaglandins are the most consistently efficacious at reducing IOP throughout the 24-hour period, with an average 24% to 29% IOP lowering from baseline IOP at all time points measured.20 However, it should be noted that nighttime IOP values follow the normal nychthemeral pattern and remain higher than daytime values, even with these medications. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, brimonidine, and beta-blockers have shown varied efficacies in the nocturnal period compared to daytime,20 but again these have not been shown to decrease nocturnal IOP to daytime levels. Aqueous suppressant drugs appear to have the least effect overnight due to the already reduced physiologic production of aqueous at night. Of note, topical beta-blockers may be contraindicated for nighttime dosing, because this drug class can systemically lower blood pressure and reduce ocular perfusion pressure, potentially exacerbating glaucomatous injury overnight.21 The nighttime effectiveness of Rho-kinase inhibitors has not yet been reported, but it is thought to be similar to that of prostaglandins. In summary, although topical medications lower the average 24-hour IOP, no medication has been shown to flatten the patterned rise of IOP overnight.
Results of the LiGHT trial have led to the use of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) as a first-line therapy for the treatment of ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma. The multicenter trial showed that SLT is not only noninferior to topical medication as initial therapy, but may even be slightly superior.22 The study mentioned that both reduced reliance on patient drop compliance and more effective 24-hour IOP lowering may be responsible for this finding. A CLS study performed in 2015 supported the IOP-lowering benefits of SLT with reduced average IOP over 24 hours.23 However, the study also showed that the nychthemeral pattern of IOP persisted, with IOP peaks occurring at night and with amplitudes similar to pre-SLT treatment.23
To date, the only glaucoma treatment that has been shown to completely flatten the 24-hour IOP curve is trabeculectomy surgery.24 The reduction in IOP variation and nighttime spikes is likely the primary reason that disease progression slows down in patients post-trabeculectomy. Currently, there are no studies assessing the 24-hour effects of tube shunts or minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS).
Other Nocturnal Considerations
There is an established relationship between nocturnal dips in systemic blood pressure and glaucoma progression, especially in NTG patients. One group studied nighttime blood pressure patterns in newly diagnosed glaucoma patients on prostaglandin analogues with normal IOP during office hours and found that nocturnal hypotension was associated with worse visual field progression.25 Likewise, in 2019, Kwon et al found that lower nighttime diastolic blood pressure levels were significant predictors of visual field loss in NTG patients.26 Ocular perfusion pressure, the difference between mean arterial pressure and intraocular pressure, is decreased in glaucoma patients by the combination of both nocturnal hypotension and elevated nighttime IOP peaks. In patients who show progression despite controlled daytime IOP values, it is imperative to assess for potential drops in nighttime blood pressure and to work with the patient’s medical team to reduce these events. Systemic antihypertensives should be avoided before bedtime, if possible, as should other medications that cause vascular compromise (eg, phosphodiesterase inhibitors). Further, these patients should be assessed for sleep-disordered breathing patterns, such as sleep apnea, which are known causes of nocturnal hypoxia and hemodynamic instability.14
The role of head and sleep position has also been considered as a contributor to glaucoma progression. Multiple studies have shown that IOP elevates more from sitting to supine to inverted,19 and one study found that the lateral decubitus sleeping position was significantly associated with worsening visual fields in the dependent eyes of NTG patients.10 However, the data surrounding the effects of head and sleep position in glaucoma are inconsistent, making the recommendations towards optimal sleep positions for glaucoma patients unclear.27
Future Considerations
Despite the strong evidence that lowering nocturnal IOP would minimize IOP elevations throughout the 24-hour period and help slow visual field progression in glaucoma patients, therapies that specifically target nocturnal IOP are limited. A pair of negative-pressure eye goggles that locally reduce IOP while worn overnight is being developed with some early publications showing an IOP lowering of 35% compared to controls overnight.28 Lowering IOP with this technology should also improve ocular perfusion pressure. Other technologies and therapies are moving away from drop therapy to reduce medication burden and to curb inconsistencies in IOP through the 24-hour period. Allergan (now AbbVie) recently released the bimatoprost intraocular implant, Durysta, which provides a more direct and continuous IOP-lowering effect inside the eye. The continuous drug elution may be more effective overnight than its topical counterparts, but this has not been studied. Also, MIGS procedures are gaining popularity due to their ability to reduce drop burden and provide more consistent IOP lowering, though these procedures come with their own individual surgical risks and limitations, and studies are needed to understand the effect different MIGS have on nocturnal IOP patterns.
Conclusion
The future of glaucoma therapy must take into consideration the many factors and systemic patterns affecting the optic nerve head throughout the day as well as the night. To slow progression of disease, it is no longer sufficient to focus solely on daytime IOP measurements that are conveniently obtained in clinic. Those interested in improving outcomes for patients who have glaucoma must find ways to target the multiple physiologic environments affecting the optic nerve. Individualized continuous IOP measurements, further studies of the role of intracranial pressure changes in glaucoma, and the development of treatments aimed at better 24-hour and nocturnal IOP control are a few places to start. GP
References
- Aptel F, Weinreb RN, Chiquet C, Mansouri K. 24-h monitoring devices and nyctohemeral rhythms of intraocular pressure. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2016;55:108-148. doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2016.07.002
- Liu JH, Kripke DF, Hoffman RE, et al. Nocturnal elevation of intraocular pressure in young adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39(13):2707-2712.
- Liu JH, Kripke DF, Twa MD, et al. Twenty-four-hour pattern of intraocular pressure in the aging population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40(12):2912-2917.
- Mansouri K, Weinreb RN, Liu JH. Efficacy of a contact lens sensor for monitoring 24-h intraocular pressure related patterns. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0125530. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0125530
- Aptel F, Canaud P, Tamisier R, et al. Relationship between nocturnal intraocular pressure variations and sleep macrostructure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(11):6899-6905. doi:10.1167/iovs.15-17456
- Liu JH, Bouligny RP, Kripke DF, Weinreb RN. Nocturnal elevation of intraocular pressure is detectable in the sitting position. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. Oct 2003;44(10):4439-4442. doi:10.1167/iovs.03-0349
- Grippo TM, Liu JH, Zebardast N, Arnold TB, Moore GH, Weinreb RN. Twenty-four-hour pattern of intraocular pressure in untreated patients with ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(1):512-7. doi:10.1167/iovs.12-10709
- Mosaed S, Liu JH, Weinreb RN. Correlation between office and peak nocturnal intraocular pressures in healthy subjects and glaucoma patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139(2):320-324. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2004.09.062
- Agnifili L, Mastropasqua R, Frezzotti P, et al. Circadian intraocular pressure patterns in healthy subjects, primary open angle and normal tension glaucoma patients with a contact lens sensor. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93(1):e14-21. doi:10.1111/aos.12408
- Kim YW, Kim JS, Lee SY, et al. Twenty-four-Hour intraocular pressure-related patterns from contact lens sensors in normal-tension glaucoma and healthy eyes: the Exploring Nyctohemeral Intraocular Pressure Related Pattern for Glaucoma Management (ENIGMA) study. Ophthalmology. 2020;127(11):1487-1497. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.05.010
- Yang Z, Mansouri K, Moghimi S, Weinreb RN. Nocturnal variability of intraocular pressure monitored with contact lens sensor is associated with visual field loss in glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2021;30(3):e56-e60. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001727
- Ciulla L, Moorthy M, Mathew S, et al. Circadian rhythm and glaucoma: what do we know? J Glaucoma. Feb 2020;29(2):127-132. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001402
- Ayaki M, Shiba D, Negishi K, Tsubota K. Depressed visual field and mood are associated with sleep disorder in glaucoma patients. Sci Rep. 2016;6:25699. doi:10.1038/srep25699
- Onen SH, Mouriaux F, Berramdane L, Dascotte JC, Kulik JF, Rouland JF. High prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2000;78(6):638-641. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0420.2000.078006638.x
- Tan S, Yu M, Baig N, Chan PP, Tang FY, Tham CC. Circadian intraocular pressure fluctuation and disease progression in primary angle closure glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(8):4994-5005. doi:10.1167/iovs.15-17245
- Dubey S, Mittal D, Mukherjee S, Bhoot M, Gupta YP. Relationship between nocturnal intraocular pressure-related peak recorded by contact lens sensor and disease progression in treated glaucomatous eyes. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68(11):2427-2433. doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_2365_19
- De Moraes CG, Jasien JV, Simon-Zoula S, Liebmann JM, Ritch R. Visual field change and 24-hour IOP-related profile with a contact lens sensor in treated glaucoma patients. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(4):744-753. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.11.020
- Friberg TR, Sanborn G, Weinreb RN. Intraocular and episcleral venous pressure increase during inverted posture. Am J Ophthalmol. 1987;103(4):523-526. doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(14)74275-8
- Prata TS, De Moraes CG, Kanadani FN, Ritch R, Paranhos A Jr. Posture-induced intraocular pressure changes: considerations regarding body position in glaucoma patients. Surv Ophthalmol. 2010;55(5):445-453. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2009.12.002
- Stewart WC, Konstas AG, Nelson LA, Kruft B. Meta-analysis of 24-hour intraocular pressure studies evaluating the efficacy of glaucoma medicines. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(7):1117-1122.e1. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.10.004
- Hayreh SS, Podhajsky P, Zimmerman MB. Beta-blocker eyedrops and nocturnal arterial hypotension. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;128(3):301-309. doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00160-9
- Gazzard G, Konstantakopoulou E, Garway-Heath D, et al. Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus eye drops for first-line treatment of ocular hypertension and glaucoma (LiGHT): a multicentre randomised controlled trial [published correction appears in Lancet. 2019;394(10192):e1]. Lancet. 2019;393(10180):1505-1516. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32213-X
- Aptel F, Musson C, Zhou T, Lesoin A, Chiquet C. 24-Hour Intraocular Pressure Rhythm in Patients With Untreated Primary Open Angle Glaucoma and Effects of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty. J Glaucoma. 2017;26(3):272-277. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000604
- Klink T, Praetorius S, Leippi S, Klink J, Grehn FJ. Diurnal and nocturnal intraocular pressure fluctuations after trabeculectomy. Ophthalmologica. 2012;227(3):160-165. doi:10.1159/000333099
- Chiotoroiu SM, Stefaniu O, Noaghi M, Teodorescu A, Taina L. The role of systemic blood pressure in glaucoma progression. Rom J Ophthalmol. 2015;59(3):141-147.
- Kwon J, Jo YH, Jeong D, Shon K, Kook MS. Baseline systolic versus diastolic blood pressure dip and subsequent visual field progression in normal-tension glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2019;126(7):967-979. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.03.001
- Kaplowitz K, Dredge J, Honkanen R. Relationship between sleep position and glaucoma progression. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2019;30(6):484-490. doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000000612
- Goldberg JL, Jiminez-Roman J, Hernandez-Oteyza A, Quiroz-Mercado H. Short-term evaluation of negative pressure applied by the multi-pressure dial system to lower nocturnal iop: a prospective, controlled, intra-subject study. Ophthalmol Ther. 2021;10(2):349-358. doi:10.1007/s40123-021-00343-4