This transcript has been edited for clarity.
Hi, my name is Cecilia Canizela, BS. I’m a medical student at University of Illinois College of Medicine in Peoria, Illinois. I am here at the American Glaucoma Society meeting for the first time.
Here, we presented a poster on a retrospective review of the Xen gel stent (AbbVie), up to 3 years of follow-up. So we were looking at the long-term outcomes for patients, and what we found is that the ab interno and ab externo surgical approaches had equivalent outcomes. They were both successful at reducing number of medications and IOP, and [had] equivalent improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA).* It was important for us to take a look at the longer term, so our follow-up was up to 3 years.
This means that there are multiple ways to do the same thing, and that it’s very important for the surgeon to do what they prefer [as] both methods are equivalent. GP
*Evan Lagouros, MD, adds: There was no statistical significant difference between ab ex and ab interno at any time point up to 3 years.







